jump to navigation

statement of the uk chancellor September 17, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

Darling on Northern Rock and investor distrust:

I want to put the matter beyond doubt. In the current market circumstances, and because of the importance I place on maintaining a stable banking system and public confidence in it, I can announce today that following discussions with the Governor and the Chairman of the FSA, should it be necessary, we, with the Bank of England, would put in place arrangements that would guarantee all the existing deposits in Northern Rock during the current instability in the financial markets.
This means that people can continue to take their money out of Northern Rock. But if they choose to leave their money in Northern Rock, it will be guaranteed safe and secure.

generic financial advice September 17, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

looks really boring. And there’s a statement at the bottom of the web page:

For a statement on Northern Rock plc please visit the FSA website.

The Treasury Press release stated that generic financial advice would also be available from A4e. When I visited their web site just now the most likely place to look for generic financial advice seemed to be a link under the heading Financial Inclusion and Education which took me to a page headed Moneyhelp – supported by HBOS but I’m not sure if that is the right place to look.

more troubles at northern rock September 17, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

Savers continue to withdraw funds despite this announcement by Callum McCarthy of the FSA on Saturday:

To be absolutely clear, if we believed that Northern Rock was not solvent, we would not have allowed it to remain open for business. It is open for business and it can continue to receive deposits and allow customers to make withdrawals.

The Chief Executive of Horthern Rock stated on Sunday:

Your money is safe with us and if you want some, or all of it back, then you are perfectly entitled to it. Whilst you may have to wait a little longer than usual to receive it, you will get it. However, your savings are secure and there is no need for you to withdraw your money based on our recent announcement, and the widespread media coverage that has ensued. The Bank of England has agreed to provide a funding facility to enable us to manage through the current global liquidity crisis. They would not have done so, if we were not a solvent, adequately capitalised, well run bank. I hope this helps to reassure you.

Meanwhile the Guardian and the BBC are remembering the UK’s secondary banking crisis in 1973.

more weirdness at the consumer direct website September 15, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

After reading the material on Christmas savings plans at Consumer Direct, I started to read the advice about borrowing money, and then started looking at the suggested template letters for complaining to providers of goods and services. All well and good. But I noticed that there’s an odd picture at the edge of the web page showing a partly clothed woman wearing a construction helmet. What does she have to do with complaint letters, I wonder? Well, she seems to be related to advice about holidays – presumably the reference is to people turning up for their holiday to find the hotel they are staying in is only half built. But she turns up on pages that have nothing to do with holidays, and, in any case, why don’t they have a picture of a man in surf shorts and a construction helmet? It turns out they do have pictures of men – one is wearing a lurid green sweater that looks as though it shrank in the wash, another older bald man in a pale blue shirt is holding a steering wheel and looking as though he is about to crash into something. There’s another woman too – this one is covered in food that seems to have escaped from a faulty blender. The nearly naked woman is the only one of the bunch who looks remotely intelligent or capable…..

musings on financial education and christmas savings September 15, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

The UK Treasury set up an independent review of generic financial advice (the Thoresen review). Next week there will be a pilot of face-to-face, internet, and telephone generic financial advice.

In looking at the Consumer Direct website to see if there is any information available before the launch (scheduled for Monday 17 September) I came across (post Farepak collapse) pages on Christmas savings. There is a handy comparison chart, which shows the differences between various products. I find it a bit confusing that the chart uses large green ticks (UK term) or check marks (US term) to identify product characteristics. I would assume such a marking reflected a positive attribute, but products which require you to buy from a particular supplier have a nice big green tick/check mark, and I’m not sure that is a desirable feature.

There is also a set of pages with pictures of Christmas tree baubles in different colours. These baubles do not seem to be intended to be colour coded to reflect the desirability of the products. Bank savings accounts have a green bauble and credit union savings accounts have an orangey-red one although the descriptions of these products are unsurprisingly very similar. But don’t the colours send an implicit message about the different products, especially given the move to traffic light markings on foods in the UK?

liquidity support for northern rock September 14, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

The UK Treasury, the Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority issued a statement about the liquidity support provided to Northern Rock, the 5th largest mortgage lender in the UK, by the Bank of England. Northern Rock issued its own statement. Depositors panicked and Northern Rock kept branches open late. Northern Rock’s share price fell sharply.
The regulators have emphasised that the problem is one of liquidity rather than of asset quality. Clearly there is not universal confidence in this view. Deposits who deposit up to £35,000 are protected, and would receive most of their money back if they deposit money in a bank that fails. Perhaps UK depositors are thinking of the collapse of the Farepak Christmas savings scheme towards the end of 2006.

Northern Rock used to be a building society, but transformed itself from a mutual business into a for profit enterprise. Northern Rock relies more heavily on capital markets to fund loans than its competitors do, and this contributes to its current liquidity problems: if it can’t raise funds in the market it can’t continue to lend. But although this may be more of an issue for Northern Rock than for other lenders one visible trend over recent years has been an increased reliance by lenders on the financial markets as a source of funds for their lending business.

Willem Buiter critiques the Bank of England’s actions here and here.

student paper topics September 13, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

The American Constitution Society has developed an online resouce, Researchlink, with suggested paper topics in various areas. The resource is designed to further the needs of public interest organizations.

eu opacity September 12, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

After the previous post suggesting the EU tends to transparency I have to link to this euobserver article reporting journalists’ discomfort with EU opacity.

financial trade associations and transparency September 12, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

I have an ongoing research interest in financial trade associations as private rule-making and standard-setting bodies and as lobbyists on financial regulation. ISDA is one of the FTAs I am interested in. One important focus of ISDA’s attention is encouraging jurisdictions around the world to recognise netting. Today I noticed that ISDA made a submission a couple of days ago on Proposals to Achieve Confirmation of “Enforceability of Close-Out Netting in Malaysia under the Malaysia Deposit Insurance Corporation Act 2005” to Perbadanan Insurans Deposit Malaysia, the Malaysian Deposit Insurer. PIDM makes it clear that the consultation follows representations by ISDA, and notes the importance of transparency. However, ISDA’s recent submission to PIDM is not generally available, although it is available to ISDA members. Other ISDA comment letters which are not publicly available are comments to the Reserve Bank of India on Derivatives and on Credit Default Swaps. Comment letters to US and EU bodies on the other hand are publicly available. I am intrigued by this contrast: it’s not clear to me whether ISDA’s approach to publication of its comments is driven by deference to the preferences of the bodies to which it makes submissions or by something else. The SEC and EU bodies such as the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS) publicise responses to their consultation documents and rule-making proposals, whereas PIDM states:

PIDM will collate all the comments received and publish its responses, including any amendments to the draft Regulations and draft Policy Statement, on its website. The draft Regulations will come into force after the normal legislative process.

wine in the eu September 12, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

I’m listening to the EU Parliament’s live streaming of a public hearing on wine policy in the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development. Wine producer representatives are talking to the committee. I started listening to the English version, but then moved on to the French which somehow seems much more appropriate to discussions of wine (even though the speaker whose intervention I’m currently hearing is from Austria). The Commission proposed reforms of the wine sector in July this year (the proposed new regulation is here). One of the problems the EU is addressing is that Europeans are drinking less wine than they used to do.

The Commission states that the objectives of the reform are to:

– increase the competitiveness of the EU’s wine producers; strengthen the reputation of EU quality wine as the best in the world; recover old markets and win new ones in the EU and worldwide;
– create a wine regime that operates through clear, simple rules — effective rules that balance supply and demand;
– create a wine regime that preserves the best traditions of EU wine production,reinforces the social fabric of many rural areas, and ensures that all production respects the environment.

At the same time the Commission notes that there are issues relating to health, consumer protection, the WTO, and common agricultural policy reform. So it’s business as usual: producer and consumer interests may conflict; culture and economic efficiency may conflict; and the different Member States, wine producers and non-wine producers have their own different views about how to move forward.