jump to navigation

easy read consultation documents August 22, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

One of my interests is in how governments, regulators and supranational standard setters carry out consultation exercises. In particular I have focused on multilevel financial regulation – regulation which involves supranational standards and domestic implementation – and I have recently argued that financial firms and their trade associations have enormous advantages in terms of helping to frame debates about financial regulation and to affect outcomes. The UK’s Treasury Department has an ongoing consultation exercise on gender as a factor in the assessment of insurance risks (comments to be submitted by September 4th). The Treasury links to the Government’s wider review of equality law. In contrast with the Treasury’s consultation, the broader consultation by the Communities and Local Government Department is presented in the normal versions and in an “easy read” version with pictures.

In principle I think that the idea of presenting consultation documents in ways that maximise the number of people who can participate is a really good idea. But the execution is odd in this case. The pictures are really ugly and often don’t link well to the text. And in contrast with the Disability Rights Commission‘s web pages, which are also presented in an easy read format, the document has no audio files (although it does appear to be possible to obtain an audio version). Here is an example which , I think, illustrates how the drafters missed opportunities: alongside text which reads “The Government would like to hear what you think by 4 September 2007, there is a picture of a calendar showing September 2007. The picture does not suggest that the 4th of September is different from any other day. As another example, just below this the text reads: “The details about how to tell us what you think are at the end of this paper.” The illustration alongside this text shows a picture of a hand holding a pen poised above a piece of paper.

eu-china relations August 21, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

Peter Mandelson, the EU’s trade commissioner, issued a statement yesterday responding to suggestions that the EU was engaging in protectionism with respect to China:

As Trade Commissioner, I will not accept claims of toxicity being used as a pretext for protectionism. Equally, I will give firm backing to European companies having to reject goods that are dangerous to consumers, including young children. This is not a question of trade but of health.
If some in China want to create the pretext for retaliatory action, the EU will contest this in the strongest terms. Action should be taken where this is needed but otherwise the bulk of our trade should continue as normal.

mattel class action August 21, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

Via Law.com:

Philadelphia law firm Woloshin & Killino filed a class action suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court Monday against toy company Mattel Inc.
The suit was filed in an effort to compel Mattel, the importer of millions of Chinese-made toys that have been recalled in the past few weeks due to lead paint and small magnets, to pay for lead testing for children who may have been affected by the toys.

children and chemical exposure August 19, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

Recalls of consumer products may protect consumers from the risks associated with those particular products, but they don’t help consumers evaluate the risks of exposure to danger in future. Trade Associations such as the Toy Industry Association promote the idea that toys are safe:

All toys sold in America must conform to U.S. safety standards – the most extensive, effective, and widely emulated standards in the world – regardless of where they are manufactured. The recent recalls are due to company-specific problems with their testing and inspection processes. Companies make toys, not countries, and companies are responsible for adhering to rigorous safety standards and inspecting their products prior to delivery. Providing safe toys is the priority of the toy industry, and we are committed to continuous improvement in design testing and inspections to ensure the highest quality.

Dangerous chemicals in toys are, of course a small part of the risk of exposure to dangerous chemicals incurred by children around the world, although they are perhaps easier to regulate than some of the other risks. The EU adopted a directive on phthalates in toys in 2005, and similar legislation is pending in California (note that there’s some controversy about the dangers of phthalates). On the wider range of risks to which children, particularly poor children, are exposed, see, for example, this Report by the WHO.

outsourcing and legal standards August 16, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

When firms outsource functions to other jurisdictions they may incur new risks. Recent recalls by Mattel of toys produced in China, and distributed around the world, illustrate this problem. Mattel had attempted to shield itself from risks that local manufacturing standards might not be consistent with toy safety requirements around the world by imposing its own standards by contract. In a filing with the SEC, Mattel said that:

Mattel believes that it has some of the most rigorous quality and safety testing procedures in the toy industry. Consistent with this, Mattel has launched a thorough investigation and expanded its testing programs to ensure that painted finished goods, at third-party contract manufacturers and facilities operated by Mattel, are systematically tested prior to being shipped to customers.

Mattel’s 2007 Global Citizenship Report describes Mattel’s Global Manufacturing Principles. Despite these GMPs, some products were produced for Mattel in China using lead paint, and distributed for sale to consumers. Mattel recognises in its most recent form 10Q that these developments may have an adverse impact on demand for Mattel’s products.

According to an EU Commission Press Release, the EU’s Consumer Protection Commissioner, Meglena Kuneva, “expressed her satisfaction that the danger posed by these toys was detected by the producer in its own audits and that the company acted responsibly.”

Some consumers are less sanguine:

blenderlaw August 14, 2007

Posted by Bradley in : Uncategorized , comments closed

The core of Blenderlaw relates to the theory and practice of harmonisation of law and practice through formal and informal channels, through the actions of domestic legislators and regulators as well as of supranational organisations. In addition, non-governmental organisations contribute to harmonisation by lobbying, and by developing codes of practice and standard form contracts. In particular this weblog will focus on the blending of financial and corporate law. The term blenderlaw is also a critical term, reflecting some scepticism about the value of legal harmonisation projects.

This weblog also hosts material relating to my classes at the University of Miami School of Law in Coral Gables, Florida.